Saturday, July 29, 2006

Theological Reflection on Incidents

(I think I've found a new purpose for my blog.)

based on the Art of Theological Reflection by Killen and de Beer, 1997.

Assumptions:

Theological reflection is an act of making meaning.

Making meaning out of our lives and the events in our lives is a fundamental human ambition.

Making meaning is most pressing when our ordinary explanations or comforts are unsettled.

On the other hand, we often look to quiet discomfort and up-ended worldviews as quickly possible, thereby rushing to new but superficial meaning making.

Theological reflection, then, requires a process in which the feelings of discomfort are fully engaged and explored before rushing to new insights.


Things that need meaning-making (and that have simply been stacking in the back compartments of my skull):

1. Cancer. People with cancer, easing closer into my sphere of ignorant comfort.
2. Marriage. Eternity. Lying next to the same person in bed for fifty years. Losing good friends to that.
3. Things to look forward to/long for; how to do the former and not the latter. How something can be amazing but not, nirvana but not: mothers know.
4. Living life to its fullest; giving everything your all.
5. Knowing enough and doing enough and being enough to live on this earth. The fight against apathy. All those things to deserve to be alive, and coming to terms with falling short. Self-acceptance and forward-moving. Recognizing "incidents" that require "reflection." "Reflecting" upon them.
6. Figuring how people fit into my life, the constant shifts. To not be disappointed in them, to help them as fully as I can. To continue to expect highly and be expected of highly.
7. When I will be comfortable enough to share this, my thoughts, with them. When I will be okay with myself enough.

Monday, July 24, 2006

Some cheering up, please

Things I like:

sunshine
icebreakers
smoked salmon
cacti
anchovies

Things that make me happy:

sunshine
clean beaches, and visiting them
exploring quiet deserted places
ferris wheels
the nervousness before a first date
purchasing my own new cutting board for my own new place

the first list is practically all food, and the second list just makes me melancholy.

Sunday, July 23, 2006

six year old nightmare

I don't want to build carosels after I'm dead.

Build carousel on a moving truck in the dark.

Taunting frogman -- "little pissant" driving a coach, wielding a huge treee-trunk hit and killed by the car he didn't see coming --- his face growing colder and stiffer, colder and stiffer. The children -- how would they spend death--? nearly see them die as well.

Come to the house of the famous author, the library with the movie famous exhibit; the dismantled carousel they need to put together. The Japanese exhibits ready to build, taken apart.

She was putting them together alone--need help? by herself -- I could barely see her but i saw the moving walls.

I had come to the home of the great author, and calling out his name to the figure or the moving coach, it was only then that I saw it was not him. He held a tree trunk and nearly hit me -- he did but I ducked. He wanted to kill me, the featureless, expressionless monstrosity of a face -- illogical, but I killed him and his coach in the end.

Funny how that car coming made no noise.

Friday, July 21, 2006

Most amusedly mean movie review ever

from where else? the New York Times.

July 21, 2006
MOVIE REVIEW

Finding Magic Somewhere Under the Pool in 'Lady in the Water'
By MANOHLA DARGIS

IT was just around the time when the giant eagle swooped out of the greater Philadelphia night to rescue a creature called a narf, shivering and nearly naked next to a swimming pool shaped like a collapsed heart, that I realized M. Night Shyamalan had lost his creative marbles. Since Mr. Shyamalan’s marbles are bigger than those of most people, or so it would seem from the evidence of a new book titled “The Man Who Heard Voices” (and how!), this loss might have been a calamity, save for the fact that “Lady in the Water” is one of the more watchable films of the summer. A folly, true, but watchable. [...]

Of course even Mr. Spielberg is not Mr. Spielberg anymore (see “Munich”)... Even when he is gleefully blowing the planet to smithereens, as he does in “War of the Worlds,” Mr. Spielberg takes on the important issues now, leaving the easy kids’ stuff to manqués like Mr. Shyamalan. This can happen when someone matures, or at least goes gray. Though in Hollywood — which is something of an enormous incubator, where embryonic personalities curl up in their own goo, kind of like Neo before he unplugs from the Matrix — growing up is sometimes awfully hard to do. [...]

Mr. Shyamalan has said “Lady in the Water” began as a bedtime story he told his daughters, to whom he has dedicated the film. There are all kinds of bedtime stories, those that lull you to sleep and those that keep you anxiously perched at the edge of the bed. [...]

Unfortunately, while Ms. Howard’s character, the regrettably named Story, spends a lot of the film wet, she’s one of those juiceless virginal fantasies who inspire pure thoughts, noble deeds and stifled yawns. Disney’s Little Mermaid comes off like a tramp by comparison, which suggests that Mr. Shyamalan needs to add a fairy-tale revisionist like Angela Carter to his bedtime reading.

That seems unlikely, since he appears insistent on clinging to myths, particularly about innocence and faith, that serve the myth of his own genius. In “Lady in the Water,” an unseen narrator (David Ogden Stiers) explains that while man once listened to “those in the water,” he no longer does, which is why we have gone to hell in a handbasket or words to that effect. Apparently those who live in the water now roam the earth trying to make us listen, though initially it’s rather foggy as to what precisely we are supposed to hear — the crash of the waves, the songs of the sirens, the voice of God — until we realize that of course we’re meant to cup our ear to an even higher power: Mr. Shyamalan.

That doesn’t make him any different from any other bubble boy with a fat paycheck and the slavish attention of a media that mocks his narcissism by publishing articles about his narcissism. Before movies could talk, the great director Erich von Stroheim stuck a von in his name and a monocle over an eye and strutted around Hollywood until the producer Irving Thalberg slapped him down to size. (Guess who Hollywood named an Academy Award for?) In “You’ll Never Eat Lunch in This Town Again,” Julia Phillips writes that Martin Scorsese greeted a news report about Sara Jane Moore’s attempt on Gerald Ford’s life with the line “You think this’ll hurt the picture?” He was worried about “Taxi Driver.” It didn’t hurt, thank goodness.

Mr. Shyamalan isn’t an artist on the level of Mr. Scorsese; he’s just another film director who, having made a lot of money for a lot of people, was crowned an auteur at an age when he should have been deemed promising. The curse of the auteur fells a lot of filmmakers, in and out of the studio system. And paradoxically, the weakest link in Mr. Shyamalan’s new film is its story, which is filled with strenuously overworked bits and locutions like scrunt (kind of like a devil dog) and the tartutic (monkeylike creatures that descend from the trees). Mr. Shyamalan has yet to realize that one Giamatti in the hand is worth two scrunts in the bush, but maybe one day, after he’s recovered all those misplaced marbles, he will.

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Ex-boyfriends

List of men to never date: older men, Germans, Japanese, passive-aggressive Cambodians. Newest addition: Christians. It sounds like I've been dating the axis of evil. If I really want to complete the tally all I need to add are North Koreans and maybe an Iranian or two. Don't do it, man. I don't know.

I spend so much time and energy being distracted by thinking about my ex that I feel like my interest and energy for other parts of life are sapping away. I know that it's best that we broke up. We wouldn't have lasted, all the ba-jillion reasons placed end to end would reach from here to Kansas. And yet it always goes down to the same gut feeling of wondering if he's wondering the same thing.

And when we spoke more frankly today than we have in about three months, when he's in his right mind and I'm in (more or less) mine, I know that it would never work out. If it did, he wouldn't be the guy I'd want anymore. It's as simple as that. It opens up that plummeting despair which my illicit hopes have set me up for. Why are we both so distractable and rational at different times? Why so arbitrarily? He has only two conditions for a girl he would date; why does one have to be so, so impossible?

(How does the world--or just its people--come to be rigged this way?)

Why do I still want so much to go dancing with him?

Educated, "liberated" girls shouldn't be moping like this. ("It's women like you who are sending the feminist movement back fifty years!")

I just want to go dancing. With him, with someone. Without him.

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Porous borders

I am filling out a leave form for work. My parents and I are going to Toronoto--no, not even, a suburb of Toronto--next week to check out the Hong Kongese mall there, as well as the renowned Cantonese cuisine. Yes, we are driving eight hours to eat Chinese food, as though we don't get enough of it in Flushing alone. And me, at work. The immigrant diaspora stretches very far, and there's no telling what members will do to seek out a similar community, compare and insult its inferior qualities. Ah, North America, with people fleeing to and from its holey internal borders.

There's a news article out today about 100 illegal immigrants being rescued from the Arizona desert, many of whom had not had water in almost four days. Handing out water bottles created a frenzy. The smugglers were nowhere to be seen. Three people were reported to have died, but not bodies were found yet, and they posted more guards. Since they were not actually caught passing the border, they're not charged with any crimes, but they certainly are illegal.

Sorry for my silly summary of this news article, but until I hit my stride with this blogging thing I'm just going to go with the flow. Seeing my previous posts, the last from about two years ago, makes me realize that I think too much. I think too much and don't do enough.

You may not be able to teach an old dog new tricks, but I am not that old, and I can make the attempt to learn. I'm training myself not to think too much. Just do. Hopefully this blog will hone both my thinking into some sort of productive creative output instead of sputtering and short-circuiting my iniative to DO things.

Enough of this.